I just adhere to the principle of the Author's death. And this is not because it violates the consistency of my theory, but the film itself violates the thematic consistency of the series, even despite the common author. I understand part of your disagreement is related to the film, but for me the film is simply not a reliable source. The only thing that really looks like magic is the use of shadows by Pride, but this is a separate topic for conversation. The same applies to FMAB homunculi, where the source of alchemy was not the Red Stones but the Philosopher's stone. I was annoyed by such inattention and that's why I wanted to write this post. This is a detail that was overlooked by people who called Wrath's use of alchemy a plot hole. Even in the scene where Wrath uses the alchemy circle against Lust, his hand merges with the surface of this Alchemy Circle. This can be seen in almost all the scenes with him. Wrath also changes his body, just before that he merges objects in with his body. Then why can Wrath use Alchemy in relation to the surrounding world? But in fact this is not the case. Changing the carbon structure in the body to create an absolute shield is also alchemy, but directed only towards one's own body. Does there exist in the world of FMA a force other than alchemy capable of changing the shape of things? The only difference between the power of homunculi and alchemists is that homunculi cannot use alchemy in relation to other things other than their bodies. The bottom line is that Homunculi have supernatural abilities. That's why Ed is so upset and angry when he sees his limbs at the disposal of someone else (Wrath). The fact that Ed's arm and leg can be taken out of the Gate by pure chance violates the principle of justice, since this was HIS payment. The same applies to the Equivalent Exchange, because even before Dante's monologue at the end, the series shows that the equivalent exchange can be violated by the fact that the payment for human transmutation that was "final" can be canceled by a third party. For example, this concerns what is the Truth in the Gate (Izumi, in a conversation with Ed, doubts that the Truth exists because she has not seen anything like it in the Gate).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |